|
Store replenishment system provides time and
labor savings, visual impact
Exclusive web-only article for August 2009
By Len Lewis
|
They call it the “pit,” an area in the center
of the store devoted to fast- moving items. But
what happens when the fast movers don’t hit the
pit fast enough?
This was the scenario facing BrandsMart U.S.A.,
a Hollywood, Fla.-based discounter of home
appliances and electronics that operates eight
high-traffic warehouse-style stores in Florida
and Georgia. It wanted a replenishment system
that could eliminate trips between the warehouse
and the center of the store without increasing
out of stocks and boosting labor costs.
At the same time, the chain needed a way to
safely and quickly move smaller items into the
store from an adjacent warehouse. The solution
was a virtually silent overhead conveyor system
from Lakeland, Fla.-based TriFactor
Distribution.
“They wanted something that would be memorable,”
says TriFactor COO JJ Phelan. “We looked at
several ways to do it but decided this was the
best mix of function and impact.”
TriFactor had considerable experience with
conveyor systems, but most of that work centered
on engineering and design for distribution
centers. Working with that company’s engineers,
BrandsMart designed a system that would make
optimum use of existing space in both the
warehouse and the store. The result was a
150-ft., 24-volt motorized driven roller (MDR),
zero pressure accumulation conveyor that moved
product through an opening in an upper wall
separating the warehouse and store.
“It’s a modular device that you put together
like an erector set,” says Larry Levine, vice
president operations for BrandsMart. In the
selling area, a center spiral that looks like a
corkscrew descends 26 ft. to a glass cage with a
window that enables a restocking crew to pick up
the merchandise.
Restocking the 12,200-sq.-ft. “pit” at the
center of the store “where we carry housewares
and small appliances has always been our biggest
problem,” Levin says. “If it’s particularly
busy, replenishment is going on all day and
traffic between the warehouse and the middle of
the store gets a little harrowing: I’ve had to
play chicken with forklifts a couple of times at
some stores.
“But this isn’t so much a safety issue as it is
a hassle to restock,” he says. “Anyone who does
it during business hours has exactly the same
issues.”
Space and sound
Having sufficient back-up stock to meet consumer
demand is a big part of the company’s strength,
Levine says, but “that requires a sizeable
amount of space. In fact, our warehouse
requirement is kind of extreme.” Because of
this, BrandsMart considered several different
design variations for the conveyor system –
including routing it beneath the store.
“But before implementing anything we also
thought a lot about sound,” he says. Most
conveyor systems are quite noisy – less than
ideal in a store environment – but “you can
stand next to this thing and you can barely hear
it running,” he says.
Another bonus: the system provides some “green”
benefits. “A conventional roller is driven by AC
motors and gearboxes that transfer power by way
of belts or chains; the BrandsMart conveyor
system has DC motors built inside the rollers to
muffle noise, and smart technology enables the
system to “fall asleep” when it’s not needed to
significantly reduce power consumption.
As an added bonus, the system is easier to
maintain than a traditional conveyor and has
less environmental impact since it does not use
materials like gearboxes, reducers and heavy
motors, Phelan says.
Reduced labor costs
BrandsMart undertook the first installation four
years ago and has since placed the conveyor
system in two new stores and an existing
location. In some instances, merchandise
throughput has improved as much as 400 percent,
while labor requirements have been cut in half.
In a typical warehouse, Phelan says, labor
accounts for up to 70 percent of operational
costs. “Since a majority of labor is associated
with picking and replenishment, this system gets
to the low-hanging fruit that would otherwise
cost a lot of time, money and effort,” he says.
As successful as the conveyor system has been,
it may not be right for all stores, Levine says.
“It wouldn’t pay to install them in stores with
lighter traffic, where platforms and pallets are
easier to use.”
Whether a similar system can be used in other
areas of the store remains to be seen. “We
probably could, but it might not be practical
for us,” Levine says. |
| |