|
|
From May 2008
At a hearing of the House Judiciary crime,
terrorism and homeland security subcommittee
last October, Target vice president of assets
protection Brad Brekke testified that retailers
spend an estimated $12 billion annually to fight retail theft. He |
Sponsored by
|
|
also described how Target has built forensic laboratories with latent
fingerprint and other technologies to support investigations. |
The Coalition Against Organized Retail Crime,
whose members include Walgreen, Wal-Mart, Target
and Macy’s, has been lobbying for federal
legislation to require online auction sites to
disclose more information on high-volume sellers
and to post serial numbers for products. CAORC
also is seeking congressional action on a draft
of an ORC bill.
Ty Kelley, director of government relations for
the Food Marketing Institute and co-chair of
CAORC, says the draft seeks to make ORC a
federal felony and targets “the rings that steal
at store level” as well as the fences “who
fraudulently obtain goods and sell them.”
“We believe Congress needs to step in here and
pass a bill so we can have better clarity in the
federal codes with respect to organized retail
crime and more responsibility on the part of
Internet auction sites,” Kelley says. Those
auction sites would be required “to keep better
records, including the addresses and phone
numbers” of individuals who sell $1,000 or more
of a product monthly or $12,000 worth of a
product in a year to protect against the sale of
stolen merchandise.
State retail associations are also drafting
proposed legislation that would make it a felony
to knowingly buy and then resell stolen goods
over the Internet.
At press time, draft legislation entitled “Theft
with Intent to Resell by Internet” had passed
the Wisconsin House judiciary committee. If
passed, the bill would offset the fact that
Wisconsin has one of the weakest deterrents for
penalizing people who steal from retailers
(retail theft has to total at least $2,500
before the crime can be elevated from a
misdemeanor to a felony).
Muscato, who helped write the draft of the
proposed Wisconsin bill, strongly believes that
ORC legislation should be separate and apart
from e-commerce |
 |
| legislation with its
focus on penalizing people who knowingly
sell stolen retail goods via the
Internet. |
Difficult to enforce
The Colorado Retail Association “worked very
hard” on its draft ORC/e-commerce legislation,
but it ultimately failed because it was “written
too broadly,” Muscato says. The bill would have
prohibited the Internet sale of items like baby
formula, gift cards and FDA date-controlled OTC
drugs, he says, but “whose definition do we use
to describe what is a non-prescription drug? Are
vitamins non-prescription drugs? Diet pills?
“The bill was just too hard to enforce, and many
legislators said that,” Muscato says. “They also
said that if we brought them something more
specific, it would probably have a good chance
to pass.”
Wisconsin’s e-commerce bill may be the first
with a good chance of gaining passage, but 14
states have already instituted legislation
specifically related to criminals who steal
retail merchandise with the intent to resell.
Those states are Washington, New Jersey,
Virginia, Alabama, Oregon, Nevada, Utah,
Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, North
Carolina, Delaware and Colorado.
ORC legislative initiatives are also ongoing in
Ohio, Connecticut, Georgia and Wisconsin, and
initiatives in Indiana and Illinois are in
development.
Another legislative highlight in the fight
against ORC is a “buying stolen property” bill
passed earlier this year in Virginia and which
will go into effect in July. It allows an
undercover police officer to represent property
as having been stolen as he/she tries to build a
case against a known fence. A similar bill has
worked its way through both houses in Maryland.
Tougher ORC legislation “is one of the top loss
prevention issues confronting retailers,”
LaRocca says, “and it’s bigger than just the
$30-plus billion a year financial losses or the
loss to the state tax revenue base. You have the
safety factor. Criminals don’t care” how
over-the-counter drugs and infant formula are
stored or handled – or whether they have
expired, “which puts millions of Americans,
including the elderly and children, at risk.”
NRF consumer alert
NRF issued a consumer alert in February, warning
that common household items sold through online
auction sites could be stolen and/or tainted.
“Criminals often take advantage of honest
shoppers by selling stolen merchandise through
online auction sites,” LaRocca says. “Many
health and beauty products on these sites may
have expired or be contaminated, posing real
health risks to the buyer.
“The pennies a shopper may save buying drug
store products through Internet auction sites
are not worth the potential health risks,” he
says.
Technologies now in testing or development will
make retailers even more effective at fighting
ORC, LaRocca says.
For instance, intelligent video is being
enhanced with product-tracking features. “Soon,
retailers will be able to pick up more accurate
and actionable information when people scoop
products off a shelf or when they take
merchandise and do not pass through a register
to pay for it,” LaRocca says. “These systems
will send up red flags to alert store managers.”
LaRocca also notes that casinos and banks
married facial-recognition software with the use
of criminal databases to help “identify
criminals as they enter parking lots or stores.”
Back
|
| |