Returns management systems help retailers
spot potential fraudsters
From November 2007
By Liz Parks
When -- and how -- do you refuse a customer
seeking to return an item without a receipt? You
don’t want to turn a customer against you, but
you can’t ignore the statistics: Fraudulent
returns total $9.6 billion a year, according to
figures from the National Retail Federation. The
Return Exchange’s 2005 Retail Returns Study,
which also tracks returns abuse, puts the figure
at more than $17 billion annually.
Clearly, retailers need to establish some
parameters and systems to ensure they are saying
“no” to the right people. “Retailers are caught
between a rock and a hard place when it comes to
returns fraud, but technology is helping them,”
says Bill Alford, president of Charlotte,
N.C.-based International Lighthouse Group, a
provider of loss prevention and risk management
services.
Just recently, Alford was shopping at a CVS drug
store when a man brought in an orthopedic
bandage (retail value -- $15) he wanted to
exchange. The cashier scanned the receipt,
received an error message and called the
manager.
The POS was tied to a returns authorization
database, which informed the manager that a
bandage of this type had already been returned
on this receipt and that this store did not even
carry that particular bandage.
The cashier “said he was sorry” and handed the
receipt back to the man, who “muttered, ‘Oh
well’ and walked out,” Alford says.
There are three basic ways that dishonest people
can make money by disposing of stolen retail
goods, says Joe LaRocca, NRF vice president of
loss prevention. They can fence it on the
street, at pawn shops or flea markets and make
about 20 cents on the dollar; they can fence it
via online auction sites and make about 70 cents
on the dollar; or they can make a fraudulent
return at a store.
The latter option, LaRocca says, is relatively
low-risk and “gives them 100 percent of the
retail value -- plus sales tax.”
Given the growth in returns fraud and the
revenue that retailers are losing to it, the era
of “no-question returns is going by the
wayside,” says Cheryl Blake, vice president of
LP services for Bloomington, Minn.-based Aspect
Loss Prevention, which works with retailers like
T.J. Maxx, Marshalls and OfficeMax.
Some companies – Blake mentions Target – “are
very vigilant in that if a customer does not
have a receipt, they do not get a return,” she
says. A number of retailers are now issuing
returns in the form of store gift cards rather
than cash, “but that only gives these people
something that is still very easy for them to
sell to someone else” for upwards of 80 percent
of face value, Blake says.
The approach that appears to be most effective
in deterring fraudulent returns is automating
the process, thereby taking the decision to
grant a return out of the store’s hands.
Laurie J. Sorensen, vice president of LP and
shortage control for Macy’s Northwest, says
company policy requires customers to provide
proof of purchase in the form of a receipt or a
customer return label (CRL) to receive cash or
credit back. Otherwise, the system will only
allow store credit in the form of an easy
exchange card or merchandise-only certificate.
A CRL containing the original purchase
information “is placed on the merchandise tag
and scanned at point of sale,” Sorensen says.
“When a customer returns an item without a
receipt, we are able to scan the CRL and
identify the original tender, which they will
receive a refund to.”
As a result of this system, “we have been able
to provide better service to our customer and
minimize losses due to fraud returns,” she says.
Some national chains supplement proprietary
returns management systems with video
surveillance solutions and exception-based POS
reporting software.
Joe Davis, director of retail and security
strategy for Atlanta-based Wren Solutions and a
former LP director for Wal-Mart, says returns
management systems can be a deterrent to
criminals trying to make an illicit gain through
return fraud and a perk for honest consumers who
want to make a return, but have lost the
receipt.
Within its proprietary refund management
systems, one major retailer applies an algorithm
to specific receipts, creating a unique number
associated with that receipt throughout its
lifespan. Depending on the payment method the
customer chooses, that number can often be tied
back to individual customers.
Using the refund management services of The
Return Exchange, one national specialty chain
says it significantly reduced its returns rate,
saving tens of millions of dollars over the past
three years.
Although the chain wishes to remain anonymous,
its LP executive notes that The Return Exchange
provided a way to achieve, through automation, a
“consistent application of our returns policy
while giving our customers a better shopping
experience. Store employees love the policy
because The Return Exchange takes the decision
about authorizing a return out of the store’s
hands.”
Next