|
When terminating employees, it's critical to
cut off IT system access immediately
From May 2009
By Liz Parks
|
Not long ago, a large retail chain laid off,
among others, an executive with access to key
company business information. In an oversight,
management neglected to take away that
individual's ability to log on to the company
network and, perhaps driven by anger, that
individual logged on and downloaded highly
confidential corporate and consumer data.
Making a bad situation even worse, the company,
which did not have real-time access to its data,
did not discover the breach for three days —
plenty of time for that individual to exploit
the situation for personal gain or revenge by
selling that data or using it to publicize the
breach.
Fortunately, this story has a happy ending: an
audit revealed the breach, the company called
the police and the data was recovered. But it
was as much the result of luck as preparation,
says King Rogers, founder and principal of the
King Rogers Group and a former vice president of
assets protection for Target.
"It's very common for someone who suddenly has
his loyalty and allegiance severed, along with
his pay checks, to take information as well as
tangible property with him," Rogers says.
It's harder to protect data and property when
layoffs happen in large numbers, but Rogers and
other industry experts say that companies have
the best chance of preventing thefts and data
breaches when they have stringent IT security
protocols in place and strict termination
policies that are implemented in all instances.
Circuit City and Home Depot provide recent
examples of how the risks associated with mass
closings can be minimized when such programs are
in place.
Last January, Home Depot exited its EXPO Design
Center business and some related test concepts,
affecting 5,000 employees. The company also
streamlined various support functions, affecting
an additional 2,000 associates.
Vice president of asset protection Mike Lamb's
team was one group impacted by the layoffs,
requiring Home Depot to develop new and equally
productive ways to manage shrink and the
security of its assets.
When a retailer announces staff reductions, "you
have a perception challenge with potential bad
guys who think that shrink may not be as
important to the company as it once was," Lamb
says. "We've learned from individuals who
committed theft or fraud that part of their
motivation was that they thought there was an
opportunity because there was less of a physical
loss prevention presence in individual stores."
Home Depot enhanced its store review process by
creating dashboard exception report applications
that replaced monthly reviews that were "very
time-consuming for both asset protection
managers and store operators."
The company's pro-active restructuring appears
to have worked. "We have not seen a material
negative impact on our business results," Lamb
says. "By reallocating our resources, by
focusing on stores with a significant
opportunity for shrink improvement and by
learning to manage by exceptions, we were able
to manage change very effectively and I think
our business results demonstrate that."
Circuit City, which underwent a complete
liquidation, adopted an approach that focused on
protecting assets — including intellectual
property — in an equally comprehensive manner.
Once the country's second-largest consumer
electronics retailer, Circuit City closed 567
stores in March. Thanks to protocols put in
place as part of its PCI compliance processes,
Circuit City protected sensitive corporate and
consumer data as it terminated some 34,000
employees and liquidated approximately $1.7
billion in inventory.
Mark Stinde, Circuit City's former vice
president of loss prevention, says the company
gained valuable insights from an initial wave of
closings that shuttered 155 stores late last
year.
"In markets where all stores closed, we saw a
three-fold increase in loss incidents and the
volume of internal theft cases we had to
resolve," Stinde says. "Learning what we did
from the closing of those 155 stores enhanced
our ability to protect our stores and our data
when we did the final closings."
During both rounds of closings, Circuit City
used a variety of metrics to identify and manage
stores at varying degrees of risk, including
local crime indexes, market crime indexes,
three-year shrink histories for individual
stores and the number of internal theft cases
each store resolved over a given period of time.
Auditors were deployed to high-risk stores
daily, to medium-risk stores several times a
week and to low-risk stores about once a week,
Stinde says. In their store visits, auditors
would review inventories, particularly of
expensive high-risk goods, and ensure that all
proscribed security measures were in place.
As a result, "we would know within a day or so
whether something was missing," Stinde says.
"Then we would investigate that loss and resolve
it."
Provide personal escorts
Shrink during the mass closing of an electronics
retailer could be expected to range from 2
percent to 6 percent of starting inventory
value, Stinde says. "Our shrink was on the very
low end of that. When you look at the resources
we put toward this, we feel like the expense
required to pro-actively review our systems,
programs and standards paid for itself eight to
ten-fold in dollars saved."
Other best practices for companies about to
initiate mass layoffs, says Rogers, are to
"immediately line up a team of trustworthy
people who will be remaining on board and
provide an escort for each of those being
terminated."
The escort, he says, needs to begin "at the
instant when people are told they are being
terminated." Some companies have taken to
calling their lower-level employees at home to
tell them of their termination. "It seems cruel,
but it allows companies to control the situation
much better," Rogers says.
Next
|
| |