|
Currency validators brace for the new c-note
From April 2009
By David P. Schulz
|
The arrival of the new $100 bill has been pushed
back, perhaps to late June, but money-counting
and note validation technology vendors are
already on notice.
When a redesigned $5 bill was introduced a year
ago, there was not the same sense of urgency and
anticipation. For one thing, not many
counterfeiters bother with denominations as low
as $5. More important, perhaps, the upward swing
in counterfeiting activity was not as well
defined as it is now.
Lower-denomination forgeries are turning up
mostly in places where it's rare to see any kind
of currency validation, says Ed Grondahl,
executive vice president of sales and marketing
for Tidel Engineering, a Carrollton, Texas-based
maker of cash-handling systems. (By way of
unsolicited corroboration, a Papa John's driver
in Myrtle Beach, S.C., reported he was paid off
with four counterfeit $10 bills; police in Santa
Cruz, Calif., confiscated $5,000 worth of phony
money in denominations of $5, $10, $20 and $100;
and bogus $10 and $20 bills turned up in a
Huntsville, Ala., Walmart till during one 10-day
period earlier this year.)

An earlier generation of counterfeit detection
technology focused on authenticating the unique
paper on which U.S. currency is printed. In
response, thieves developed the "super bill" — a
$1, $2 or $5 note bleached and refashioned with
a scanner and high-quality printer as a $50 or
$100 — and now, it seems, a $20. The end product
passes the paper test — or so the forger thinks.
It's all about what is embedded in paper used
for currency.
Each denomination is printed with unique
watermarks and thread placement, some of which
are visible to the naked eye when viewed in
front of strong light: A sharp-eyed cash handler
can snag a fair amount of bad bills, Grondahl
says, but not all of them. That's why
top-quality currency validators combine optical
scanning (to read what is printed on the surface
of the face of the bill) with technology that
detects components (threads and watermarks)
embedded in the paper itself.
Moved to point of sale
Retail LP executives note that arrests involving
counterfeiting rose 28 percent in 2008, and the
amount of counterfeit currency in circulation
rose 5 percent, to $64.4 million. Both were at
their highest level in five years, and the trend
has continued into the first quarter of 2009. In
response, cash-intensive retailers are moving
currency validation technology from the
cash-counting backroom to the point of sale.
7-Eleven was an early adopter, putting
validators at "knee-cap level" where cashiers
can insert bills as received. If a bill is
rejected, the cashier will ask for a replacement
or another form of payment. If the customer
presses him on why the bill was unacceptable, he
can say there was writing on it, or that it was
torn, repaired with tape — or that the machine
is just plain oversensitive. No one has to
mention funny money.
Bill readers are also being rolled out at Speedy
Stop convenience stores in Texas, with the units
placed between registers. Company procedures
call for every $50 and $100 bill to be inserted
into a safe equipped with a currency validator.
"Since we've started using these, we haven't
taken in a single counterfeit bill," says Mike
Squillace, the chain's vice president of loss
prevention and risk management. |
| |