Is intimate apparel recession-proof?
From August 2008
By Len Lewis
|
Sponsored by
|
Intimate apparel is big business on a global
scale, and conventional wisdom has it that the
category generally outperforms the broader
apparel category during economic downturns.
Whether this is myth or reality is a point of
contention among industry watchers. However,
everyone can agree that lingerie is a vibrant,
high-margin category ranging from staples like
bras and panties to fashion-oriented luxury
items for women across every demographic group.
“Intimate apparel is
probably as strong as anything right now
and has traditionally fared well during
a recession,” says Mike Sandler,
chairman of the intimate apparel council
of the American Apparel & Footwear
Association, based in Arlington, Va.
“When pocketbooks tighten up, people are
less likely to make large purchases like
dresses or new outfits. Intimate apparel
gives them the ability to buy something
less expensive that makes them feel
good: It’s an affordable indulgence.”
Beyond that, the business is bolstered by the
fact that items wear out more quickly —
particularly bras and panties, which represent
65 percent of intimate apparel purchases.
“There’s a lot of replacement value there,”
Sandler says..
Still, statistics from the NPD Group indicate
that intimate apparel could use a bit of lift.
In the 12 months that ended in April, sales
totaled $10.92 billion, 3.4 percent lower than
the same period a year ago.
NPD reported that bra sales ($5.79 billion)
declined 3.3 percent and panty sales ($3.5
billion) were down slightly over that same
period. Shapewear, a much smaller ($718 million)
category, experienced the biggest squeeze — 9.2
percent.
Sleepwear, which is listed separately by NPD,
outperformed the rest of the intimate apparel
market, rising 1.5 percent on sales of $6.5
billion. Nightwear, which accounts for the bulk
of sales, was up 2.9 percent, while robes and
loungewear dipped 3.9 percent.
Virtually all retailers reported lower sales.
Specialty stores and mass merchants — the
biggest segments — were down 4.1 and 3.9
percent, respectively. Department store revenues
declined 3.5 percent, and even factory outlets
experienced a 12.4 percent decline. The only
gain for the period (14 percent) was among
off-price retailers, a relatively small segment.
Although the economy can work in the category’s
favor, it is also its biggest challenge.
“Retailers are all being very careful about
purchasing,” Sandler says. “They are watching
inventory very carefully and are less likely to
experiment with new things,” which is likely to
result in higher stock outs.
Meanwhile, while China remains a large producer
of intimate apparel, it is no longer the least
expensive one, so companies are going to
Vietnam, Cambodia and back to the Philippines.
Additionally, Sandler says, “freight has gone up
dramatically and manufacturers are really being
squeezed.”
The escalating cost of gasoline could contribute
to even higher online sales. However, the pace
remains difficult to judge, according to
Sandler. “Many in the industry feel that
lingerie is a category that consumers look at
online but go to the stores to buy.”
What is too sexy?
The question is, which stores do they visit?
Victoria’s Secret has a firm grasp on about 30
percent of the market, but even this venerable
purveyor of intimate apparel is not immune to
market swings: After a relatively weak first
quarter, company officials have been asking
themselves whether they have veered off course
by becoming “too sexy.”
Bemoaning an overabundance of sensuality seems
oddly puritanical for a company whose marketing
theme was “What is Sexy?” However, as CEO Sharen
Jester Turney recently told analysts, “We use
the word sexy a lot and really have forgotten
the ultra-feminine. … We will return to an
ultra-feminine lingerie brand to meet [customer]
needs and expectations.” She emphasized the
success of the chain’s Pink brand, a $900
million annual business that targets a younger
demographic.
With the lingerie business becoming more
fragmented, there is no shortage of competitors
for the younger set. One of these is Gilly
Hicks, intimate apparel stores with an
Australian twist, launched by Abercrombie &
Fitch. They specialize in moderately priced
items that are described as more casual and fun
and a less-provocative alternative to Victoria’s
Secret for younger consumers, according to
industry observers. The company now has five
stores in operation and plans call for another
seven or eight this year.
View Related Stories:
Sexy Still Sells