“Brand hijacking” is a growing portion of
spam proliferation
From May 2008
By Rebecca Logan
|
Sponsored by
|
What do Indiana Jones, Dunkin’ Donuts and
John McCain all have in common? They are all
victims of “brand hijacking,” one of several
trends highlighted in recent installments of
Symantec’s monthly State of Spam Report.
In February, Symantec began posting and
archiving its spam reports online. Look at
www.symantec.com/business/theme.jsp?themeid=state_
of_spam to get a sense of the carrots spammers
might be dangling in your employees’ inboxes in
a given month.
“It all goes back to brands and name
recognition,” says Dermot Harnett, principal
analyst for the anti-spam team at Symantec, a
Cupertino, Calif.-based company that sells
infrastructure software. Spammers often go for
what recipients already know. “These are the
things that interest people in their day-to-day
lives.”
One recent campaign that promised a link to the
new “Indiana Jones” trailer was, instead, a
guise for completely unrelated spam. Cashing in
on the constant attention given to political
candidates during an intense primary season,
spammers have promised Hillary Clinton videos
but instead relay a malicious Trojan, according
to the March Symantec report. Others have linked
John McCain and Barack Obama’s names to items
like “portable de-wrinkle machines.”
Some spammers have resorted to what Symantec
dubbed “Google Search abuse” – using an URL that
looks like a search string for Google – which
links instead to the spam domain mentioned at
the end of the URL.
Retailers often make prime targets for spammers
trying to hide behind established brands,
Harnett says. Spammers have lately promised gift
cards from companies such as Target, Wal-Mart
and Dunkin’ Donuts in an effort to get
recipients to click on a link.

Spamming trends
Among the other trends noted in recent Symantec
reports:
Overall spam volume now represents a staggering
78.5 percent of all e-mail tracked for the
February and March reports. “Spammers are
finding it increasingly difficult to get around
anti-spam filters,” Harnett says, “so they’re
throwing a lot more spam at them hoping to evade
some of these filters.”
An increasing percentage of spam messages
(roughly 44 percent, up from 31 percent last
summer) appear to originate from Europe. (It is
difficult to determine the actual origin because
some spammers use Trojans to relay e-mail and
mask their true geographic location.) About 35
percent of recent spam appears to originate in
North America.
Nearly half of the messages passing through the
Symantec Probe Network were classified as being
related to products (goods and services such as
investigation services or make-up) or the
Internet (web hosting, web design or,
ironically, anti-spamware).
Globally, health-related spam represents only 12
percent of messages passing through the network
— but it is the No. 1 spam category in the
Asia/Pacific region, where 38 percent of spam
relates to subjects like pharmaceuticals,
medical treatments and herbal remedies.
Image spam has decreased and, not surprisingly,
so too has the average message size — a bit of
bright news in an otherwise frustrating spam
landscape. Image spam peaked at 52 percent of
all spam in January 2007, Harnett says.?” It’s
good news for IT managers as it does present
less of a strain on their resources.”
Harnett thinks back to 2004, when Microsoft
chairman Bill Gates was quoted as saying that
the issue of spam would be solved by 2006. “We
haven’t seen that,” he says, adding that
spammers have simply evolved and adapted. “Spam
will continue to exist in one form or another as
long as there are enough people who respond.”