|
|
Retailers take different approaches to
managing the next media channel
From February 2008
By
Susan Reda, Executive Editor
|
Sponsored by
|
Online retailer 1-800-Flowers recently said
“I do” to a partnership with YouTube. A “Will
you marry me?” contest to find the most
intriguing marriage proposal is now under way,
marking the first component of a year-long
relationship with Google, the parent of the
fast-growing social media site.
Last September, Neiman Marcus took over the
YouTube homepage to promote its 100th
anniversary. A specially created video showcased
the luxury department store’s style savvy.
American Eagle, Gap, Ice.com, Victoria’s Secret,
Macy’s, Nike, adidas and a handful of others
have also dabbled on YouTube, testing the waters
to determine what works and what doesn’t.
Still, the lion’s share of retailers remains on
the sidelines, tuning in to view online videos
only when their brand is parodied . . . or
worse. Retail executives say they’re intrigued
by YouTube and other social networking sites
like MySpace and Facebook, but they’re not ready
to get in the game – at least not yet.
The biggest stumbling block is fear of trademark
infringement and the desire to protect their
brand from being used improperly. The global
power of the web to enable anyone, anywhere to
instantly disseminate information and images on
a shoestring budget represents a threat that
most retailers and brand owners feel
ill-equipped to manage.
Additional worries factor into retailers’ social
media paralysis. Some fear that their operations
are too conservative for the more free-wheeling
approach of YouTube. Others plead ignorance or
offer excuses about the overwhelming task of
managing social media. Then there are the
skeptics who question its ability to lift sales.
Experts acknowledge retailer’s concerns, but
refuse to allow executives to use fear as an
excuse for wavering.
“It’s a challenge for retailers – one that is
shared by the entire advertising community,”
says David Polinchock, founder and chief
experience officer at Brand Experience Lab. “In
the past, companies controlled their media buy.
They knew the target and they knew where to find
those eyeballs. That’s not the case any more and
it’s scary.
“What’s more, a few years back shoppers accepted
mediocrity,” he says. “Now, they won’t tolerate
a poor shopping experience and they have no
qualms about sharing a company’s flaws with
millions of Americans in online blogs and
videos.”
Opportunity knocks
Still, Polinchock views the social aspect of the
web as a huge opportunity, pointing out that
most retail companies have a lot of content.
“The problem is that they’re building content on
one end of their business and don’t think to use
it in another; they need to rethink that.”
Retail companies should be looking for ways to
engage brand “evangelists” and ought to explore
the use of how-to videos, he says, provided that
they’re authentic and relevant within the
context of the brand.
Sucharita Mulpuru, principal analyst at
Forrester Research, contends that while there
may not be huge upside potential in sales, there
is little downside risk to social media.
“Producing an online video is relatively
inexpensive and low effort, especially
juxtaposed with the number of eyeballs this
media vehicle delivers. I ask executives, ‘What
are you afraid of? Is it that someone will
parody your brand? Are you afraid someone will
post a negative video talking about what went
wrong in your store?’”
The challenge, Mulpuru says, is not the policing
of YouTube and MySpace and their social content
counterparts: it’s in executing well in every
aspect of your business. “You can’t cheat on the
customer experience or shoppers are going to
call you on it – and there’s a good chance
they’ll do it using an online video shared on
YouTube,” she says.
Anne Bologna, founding partner and president of
Toy, the New York agency that dreamed up
OfficeMax’s ElfYourself holiday campaign,
insists retailers’ concerns about protecting
their brand are manageable.
“You can put protections in place to safeguard
your brand on YouTube, like deactivating user
comments,” she says. “Still, I would caution
that in a world of transparency, you have to be
careful not to overdo it. There’s something to
be said for developing a thick skin and having a
sense of humor.”
Bologna encourages clients to think of
social-networking sites as an additional media
channel. With YouTube reporting between 55
million and 75 million unique users every month,
she’s hard-pressed to figure out why a company
wouldn’t want to put itself out there. “It’s
time to understand what works in this space and
come up with a creative approach to building
content. Last year you could watch from the
sidelines: now it’s time to get in the game.”
Defining moment
Indeed, 2008 is shaping up to be a defining
period for online videos. Once a renegade source
of content, online social networking has morphed
into a segment that’s difficult to ignore.
According to the latest comScore Video Metrix,
Americans viewed nearly 9.5 billion online
videos in November, when they spent about an
hour more watching videos than they did just 10
months earlier.
YouTube’s share of the online video market is
edging past 30 percent and climbing, propped up
by Google’s $1.65 billion investment in November
2006. comScore found that 74.5 million people
viewed 2.9 billion videos on YouTube.com in
November – an average of 39 videos per viewer.
This compares with 43.2 million people who
viewed an average of nine videos on MySpace
during the same period.
Next |
| |